Skip to main content

Case 02 — Rigid beam supported by elastic vertical posts

Open in RodX Download PDF report

Verification of vertical displacement of a rigid beam supported by two vertical elastic posts with different stiffness. The system consists of a rigid horizontal beam resting on steel and aluminum posts and subjected to a concentrated vertical load. This verification case validates the correct implementation of axial bar elements with different material stiffness and their interaction with a rigid beam element in the RodX finite element solver.

Description

A rigid horizontal beam is supported by two vertical elastic posts. The left post is made of steel, and the right post is made of aluminum. The beam itself is assumed to be rigid, while axial deformations occur only in the supporting posts. A vertical concentrated load is applied to the beam at an intermediate point between the supports.

Determine:

Structural scheme

Structural scheme of an absolutely rigid beam under a concentrated vertical load, supported by two vertical posts of different stiffness

Geometry, boundary conditions, and load applications used in the verification model.

Model parameters

ParameterValue
Element typeBeam elements
MaterialSteel, Aluminum
Young's modulus2.0 × 10⁸ kN/m², 7.0 × 10⁷ kN/m²
Diameter0.02 m, 0.05 m
Boundary conditionsFixed supports at the bases of both posts
LoadsVertical concentrated load of 90 kN applied to the rigid beam

Numerical results

Displacements

Deformed shape of a rigid beam supported by two vertical posts with different axial stiffness

Table results from RodX

RodX numerical results table showing nodal displacements and rotations of a rigid beam

Comparison

Node Analytical solution RodX Midas/Civil
Δy(A) -0.286 -0.286 -0.286
Δy(F) -0.225 -0.225 -0.225
Δy(B) -0.102 -0.102 -0.102

The numerical results obtained with RodX are in agreement with the analytical solution and reference FEA results.

Reference

  1. Hibbeler, R. C. Mechanics of Materials, 10th Edition (SI Units), Pearson Education, 2017, Example 4.3, p. 149.